NAVYPEDIA

Support the project with paypal


HOME
FIGHTING SHIPS OF THE WORLD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AIRCRAFT CARRYING SHIPS
UNITED STATES attack aircraft carrier


Ships


No Name Yard No Builder Laid down Launched Comm Fate
CVA58 United States 486 Newport News 18.4.1949 --- --- cancelled 23.4.1949


Technical data


Displacement standard, t

66434

Displacement full, t

83249

Length, m

314.0 wl 331.7 oa

Breadth, m

38.1 wl 57.9 ext

Draught, m

10.5 trials

No of shafts

4

Machinery

4 sets geared steam turbines, 8 boilers

Power, h. p.

280000

Max speed, kts

33

Fuel, t

oil

Endurance, nm(kts)12000(20)
Armour, mm

belt: 37, hangar sides: 19+16, torpedo bulkhead: 32, bulkheads: 19, flight deck: 51, hangar deck: 38, protective deck: 76 - 38

Armament

8 x 1 - 127/54 Mk 39, 6 x 2 - 76/70 Mk 37, 20 x 1 - 20/70 Mk 10, 98 aircraft (18 ADR-62 bombers, 80 F2H-1 fighters)

Electronic equipment

SPS-6, SPS-8, 4x SPG-53 radars

Complement

4127



Air group


Year Fighters bombers
as designed 50 F2H-1 18 ADR-64A


Standard scale images


<i>United States</i>
United States


Aircraft facilities

 (fd - 10,800 m², ha - 8,978 m² / 76,765 m³): Flight deck: 320.0 x 61.2 m. Hangar: 261.0 x 34.4 x 8.55 m. There were 3 deck-edge elevators (45.4t, 18.3 x 18.3m) and stern centre-line elevator (45.4t, 19.2 x 15.8m). There were 4 H 9 catapults. Aircraft fuel stowage: 1 890 000 l.  Aviation ordnance stowage was 2000t.

Project history

Although she was never completed, United States is significant in the course of US carrier development as the progenitor of the Forrestal and their successors. Unlike earlier carriers, she was designed specifically to operate a particular class of aircraft, in her case heavy attack planes intended for strategic nuclear operations. Indeed, the earliest proposals were for a carrier without any hangar at all, because the aircraft would be much too large to strike below. Only well into the design were non-strategic roles considered, and indeed United States would have had smaller magazines than the later, multi-mission, Forrestals. It appears that the hangar was originally included largely to house the fighter escorts for the heavy bombers. Much attention went into flight deck arrangement, the ship being intended to launch two bombers and two fighters simultaneously from a pair of bow catapults and a pair of waist catapults splayed out to each beam. Steam catapults had not yet been invented, and she was to have had a new type of internal-combustion cylindrical catapult, which was also originally specified for the Forrestals. A fully flush deck would have simplified flight operations, and her arrangement was to have been superficially similar to that of the later angled deck ships. However, the arrangement of arresting gear would have precluded the simultaneous launch and recovery operations which are the hallmark of the angled deck carrier.

It appears that four ships in all were contemplated, and that later units might have had nuclear power. Certainly smoke disposal from a large flush deck carrier was considered a major and intractable issue. United States herself was laid down at Newport News on 19 April 1949, but the Air Force charged that the new carrier would merely duplicate its strategic mission, at а cost of $500m (against a Navy estimate of $189m] and construction was stopped on 23 April, the funds being transferred to the Air Force for bombers. The ensuring fight resulted in one of the Navy's worst peacetime disasters; heavy attack aircraft were restricted to dimensions dictated by the wartime Midway class. The major postwar jet heavy attack bomber, the A3D was designed at this time. Only the Korean War brought back the Navy's carrier programme.

Ship protection

  Horizontal protection would be consisted of 4 decks: 51mm flight deck, 25mm gallery deck, 37mm hangar deck and 37mm main deck. Vertical protection included high 37mm belt expanded to the hangar deck; hangar was protected by 19mm outer and 16mm inner sides. Underwater protection included 5 longitudinal bulkheads (including one 32mm) and can resist from exploding of 545-680kg TNT.