NAVYPEDIA

Support the project with paypal


HOME
FIGHTING SHIPS OF THE WORLD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TORPEDO SHIPS
PORTER destroyer leaders (1936 - 1937)


Photo



  Porter 1938

Ships


No Name Yard No Builder Laid down Launched Comm Fate
DD356 Porter 408 New York SB, Camden 12/1933 12.12.1935 8/1936 sunk 26.10.1942
DD357 Selfridge 409 New York SB, Camden 12/1933 18.4.1936 11/1936 stricken 11.1945
DD358 McDougal 410 New York SB, Camden 12/1933 17.7.1936 12/1936 miscellaneous auxiliary AG126 9.1945
DD359 Winslow 411 New York SB, Camden 12/1933 21.9.1936 2/1937 miscellaneous auxiliary AG127 9.1945
DD360 Phelps 1451 Bethlehem, Quincy 1/1934 18.7.1935 2/1936 stricken 1.1947
DD361 Clark 1452 Bethlehem, Quincy 1/1934 15.10.1935 5/1936 stricken 11.1945
DD362 Moffett 1453 Bethlehem, Quincy 1/1934 11.12.1935 8/1936 stricken 1.1947
DD363 Balch 1454 Bethlehem, Quincy 5/1934 24.3.1936 10/1936 stricken 11.1945


Technical data


Displacement standard, t

1834

Displacement full, t

2597

Length, m

113.4 wl 116.2 oa

Breadth, m

11.3

Draught, m

3.96 full load

No of shafts

2

Machinery

2 sets geared steam turbines, 4 Babcock & Wilcox boilers

Power, h. p.

50000

Max speed, kts

37

Fuel, t

oil 635

Endurance, nm(kts)6500 (12)
Armament

4 x 2 - 127/38 Mk 12, 2 x 4 - 28/75 Mk 1, 2 x 1 - 12.7/90, 2 x 4 - 533 TT (16), 2 DCR (14)

Electronic equipment

QCA sonar

Complement194


Standard scale images


<i>Phelps</i> 1944
Phelps 1944


Graphics


  <i>Porter</i> 1938
  Porter 1938
<i>Selfridge</i> 1944
Selfridge 1944


Project history

Ships of Porter class became the first USN destroyer leaders. Necessity in similar ships has been realised by the General Board in 1917 when along with a building of the big number of 'flushdeckers' designing of the ship, called to fulfil a role of flotilla leader was begun: larger, than destroyer, and carrying more powerful artillery. FY1921 programme provided the building of five similar ships (2200t, 35kts, 5 127mm guns, 4 triple TTs), but Congress has not outlined necessary means, giving so reason that there were a lot of destroyers in the US Navy at war end. Designing of leaders with displacement from 1600 to 2900t was started again only in the late twenties.

In 1930 the London Naval conference has established a maximal 1850t standard displacement for leaders, and the General Board earlier declined in favour of the ship with moderate dimensions, decided to raise displacement of future leaders to the resolved limit. Growth of the dimensions was supposed to expend to better seaworthiness, additional equipment, necessary for a command ship, and improvement of habitation conditions. For November, 1930 Bureau of Construction has prepared a sketch design of new ship. At 1850t standard displacement armament consisted from 4 single 127/25mm DP guns and 2 quadruple TTs, speed reached 35.5kts. Application of light armour (12.7mm thickness) of machinery and bridge became the important innovation.

Though the design as a whole satisfied the General Board, works over leader for some reasons were delayed: in particular, not a small role was played by appearance of new 127/38mm DP gun, that has demanded significant processing of the design. Again it has been submitted to considering in January, 1932, and the number of 127/38mm DP guns has increased to five (two months later, at design correction, the sixth was added). In the mid of the same year when it seemed, that all possible remarks are considered, the Bureau of Construction was able to insist on replacement of DP main guns by SP twin mounts, that allowed to raise gun number to eight. As compensation 2 quadruple 28mm AA MGs were provided.

Abandoning from DP main guns in early 1930th was presented not too much effort for two additional main guns, and in this variant armament structure have been approved by the General Board. Artillery replacement has allowed to make one more change to armament structure: to place around aft funnel storehouse for eight spare torpedoes that outlined Porter class among remaining American destroyers. Machinery arrangement of new leaders essentially did not differ from Farragut class, only turbines were positioned in separate rooms.

All eight ships of this class were built under the FY1933 program. The detailed design was fulfilled by New York Shipbuilding Co.

Modernizations

mid-1941 - early 1942, all: - 2 x 1 - 12.7/90, spare torpedoes; + 3 x 1 - 20/70 Mk 4

1942-1943, almost all survived: + SC, SG, Mk 3 radars

10 - 12.1943, all survived: - 2 x 4 - 28/75; + 3 x 2 - 40/56 Mk 1.2, 3 x 1 - 20/70 Mk 4

3/1943 - 3.1944, McDougal, Winslow, Phelps, Clark, Moffett, Balch: - 1 x 2 - 127/38 (No 3); + 1 x 4 - 40/56 Mk 1.2, 4 DCT (in total 48 DC)

late 1944 - early 1945, Selfridge: - 4 x 2 - 127/38, 1 x 2 - 40/56, Mk 3 radar; + 2 x 2 - 127/38 Mk 12 (DP), 1 x 1 - 127/38 Mk 12 (DP), 1 x 4 - 40/56 Mk 1.2, 4 DCT (in total 48 DC), Mk 12.22 radar

late 1944 - early 1945, McDougal, Winslow, Phelps: - 3 x 2 - 127/38, Mk 3 radar, 1 x 2 - 40/56; + 2 x 2 - 127/38 Mk 12 (DP), 1 x 1 - 127/38 Mk 12 (DP), Mk 12.22 radar

8/1945, Selfridge, Winslow, Phelps: - 6 x 1 - 20/70, 2 x 4 - 533 TT, 2 DCT, 1 DCR (22 DC in total); + 2 x 4 - 40/56 Mk 1.2, 2 x 2 - 20/70 Mk 4, displacement was increased to 2154/2857t.

1/1946, DD360: 2 x 2 - 127/38 Mk 38, 1 x 1 - 127/38 Mk 30, 3 x 4 - 40/60 Mk 2, 2 x 2 - 40/60 Mk 1, 2 x 2 - 20/70 Mk 24, 2 DCT, 1 DCR (22), SC, SG, Mk 12.22 radars, QCA sonar

1/1946, DD362: 3 x 2 - 127/38 Mk 22, 1 x 4 - 40/60 Mk 2, 3 x 2 - 40/60 Mk 1, 6 x 1 - 20/70 Mk 10, 2 x 4 - 533 TT, 4 DCT, 2 DCR (48), SC, SG, Mk 3 radars, QCA sonar